California Husband and Wife, who is originally from Greece, have a Son together.
When Son is an infant, Wife takes Son to Greece to visit extended family.
And decides not to return to US. And to keep Son in Greece.
Husband promptly obtains a divorce in California. The California family court awards Husband sole custody of Son.
But the Greek family court, even though Greece is a party to the Hague Convention on the Civil Aspects of International Child Abduction, does nothing to enforce the US court order.
After a couple of years of that, Husband goes to Greece and simply takes Son back to the US. Husband advises California family court of his actions.
Then Wife, as Husband had done in Greece, files an application under the Hague Convention for Son’s return to Greece.
Inexplicably, the US federal court judge presiding over the Hague Convention case in the US disregards the California family court custody order!
Instead the judge rules that Son return to Wife in Greece at that time, but establishes a rotating timesharing schedule in which Son alternates between Husband and Wife every three months.
Husband appeals the federal trial court’s ruling disregarding the California family court’s custody award.
Eventually, Husband wins his appeal. Son is to return home to California.
But now the US federal court judge rules that Wife should have a final visit with Son in Greece.
Needless to say, Wife once again retains Son in Greece. And cuts off all contact with Husband.
And, despite multiple US court orders requiring Son to be returned to Husband in the US, Son remains in Greece.
The California State Attorney’s office and the US Attorney’s office are both investigating Husband’s case.
Son likely will soon begin kindergarten in Greece.
Even if Wife would permit it, Husband cannot return to Greece to visit Son for fear of being arrested there.
